When I say live coding I don't assume an audience. I find it just too
complicated if it was required as the term is not exclusive to musical
applications in the first place and it is even in the musical setting
awkward to call it live coding on stage but not in rehearsal.
Also I don't see a problem simply saying "live coding concert" or "live
coding performance" when a particular artistic setting is meant that
implies an audience.
- G
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 2:52 AM, David Barbour <dmbarbour_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015, 1:35 AM Rob Myers <rob_at_robmyers.org> wrote:
>
> > That's realtime coding, then.
> >
>
> That term is not widely used. If you can popularise it, without creating
> confusions with real time computing and programming of hard or soft real
> time systems, then maybe I'll find it acceptable. Good luck with that.
>
>
> > We already have a constraint there (time). I think that
> > time-in-front-of-an-audience is a more accurate one.
> >
>
> If you control a squadron of killer robots, you certainly have an audience.
> They just aren't intended to appreciate it.
>
> For performance, an audience forges a relationship to the real world, real
> risks for fumbling, real rewards for success. But the live coder's
> experience is similar when it's some other relationship keeping things
> real.
>
> --
>
> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
> http://lurk.org/r/topic/1ybNvLhFpY8QN7eT5ibNvw
>
> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email
> subject: unsubscribe
>
--
--
Georg Essl
gessl_at_umich.edu
(734)-730-0791
Assistant Professor
Electrical Engineering & Computer Science and Music
University of Michigan
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/1OmUV7pFhwlyhPu3sZE8wZ
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Mon Dec 28 2015 - 14:46:07 GMT