On 04.12.2014, at 13:04, bitrituals <hellodanhett_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still torn on this. The openness and expressiveness of shared/projected code is the element that drew me into seeking out livecoded performance, and subsequently performing myself. However I still feel like in some instances I'm not enhancing anything by exposing the code to the audience, although I suppose it's a little different for someone working just on the visual side.
>
> In some contexts it might even be a negative thing: if I'm livecoding visuals at a chiptune night for example, the audience aren't expecting a mash of code constantly overlaid on top of visuals, and would potentially assume there's something wrong! I was asked "why" with regard to the exposed code quite a few times at SuperByte recently, which was quite interesting I thought.
Part of the problem might be the one-dimensional stage structure. If you have several projections in a room, you don't have to overlay code and its result.
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/4s86Rr9ZbfM72QlK2skEWF
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Fri Dec 05 2014 - 10:44:35 GMT