On 26.05.2013, at 18:02, David Griffiths <dave_at_pawfal.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 26/05/13 12:33, andrew_at_moso.com.au wrote:
>> I think you are in the majority in relation to a preference for
>> declarative approaches to timing. Personally I'm of the opposite
>> persuasion, but as the saying goes, let a thousand paradigms bloom!
>>
>
> I would say (from my humble experiments with temporal recursion in
> fluxa, very much borrowed in spirit from Extempore/Impromptu) that it
> exhibits a feature that seems to work very well in live coding
> performance - the musical process being described closely matches the
> computational process being carried out to create it.
>
can you explain a bit?
Received on Sun May 26 2013 - 21:25:47 BST