yeeeees, love that idea :-)
And "tempo" could by default also control the bpm, unless the more specific bpm command is used as well?
D
On 1 May 2012, at 20:24, Kassen wrote:
> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 06:55:35PM +0100, Davide Della Casa wrote:
>
>> Maybe we could add a special "wave" or "wavy" variable that contains the
>> equivalent of sin(millis()/1000 ). To be determined whether it should wave from
>> -1 to 1 or from 0 to 1, might depend how it behaves in the sketches.
>>
>
> If you do that, and maybe have other time-based conveniency functions
> it might make sense to also introduce a "tempo" function or similar
> that sets the variable that is 1000 in your example here?
>
> Just thinking out loud, I'm not sure this is a good idea; making
> (and keeping!) things simple is hard.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
>
Received on Tue May 01 2012 - 19:38:40 BST