>
> Regarding your paper, I like your strong definition of live coding as an
> activity where you really have to engage with or rewrite the code ad hoc.
> (i.e., the “more profound live coding must confront the running algorithm”),
> and then you state that much live coding fails to live up to that promise.
>
> Good to have some punching statements.
I've been saying this since we were discussing the nature of live coding performance in the earliest livecode list posts, and around 2002/2003 when a few of us were conceptualising what we aim to do in live performance. I'm glad if the message is now punching out, though I have to keep punching myself on the issue; always can improve the twists and turns.
I like that we both feature Scheme Bricks with an image, but have different programs in our respective shots ; )
Received on Sat Dec 03 2011 - 17:45:58 GMT