Just to be perfectly clear;
The bit about solving issues by creating rules for humans to follow was a
joke. My way of commenting that trying to define a method of expression that
itself involves tweaking definitions and challenging assumed "rules" might
be very hard indeed.
I'm sure that as soon as there would be rules most of us would either start
doing something that would blatantly be against the rules yet clearly
livecoding or follow the rules to the letter while doing something else.
Yours,
Kas.
On 26 March 2010 10:57, evan.raskob [lists] <lists_at_lowfrequency.org> wrote:
> Seconded.
>
>
>
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Click Nilson wrote:
>
>
> On 25 Mar 2010, at 23:59, Kassen wrote:
>
>
> There is a real issue here, which I hope we may attempt to resolve by
> proposing new rules.
>
>
> it's all about proposing new rules. I therefore suggest we ban innovation.
>
> x
>
>
>
Received on Fri Mar 26 2010 - 12:33:59 GMT