Yes, I agree this is better.
On 04.03.2010, at 17:19, alex wrote:
> On reflection, perhaps it would be better to re-create the live coding
> page, which would be readily justifiable by coverage in the mainstream
> media, and move the TOPLAP page to a section on there. I think the
> practice and contribution of live coding is more notable than the
> identity of TOPLAP. Currently live coding has been moved to a
> subsection of computer music, which doesn't make much sense.
>
> Perhaps lets continue the discussion here, if anyone is interested:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:TOPLAP
>
> cheers
>
> alex
>
> On 3 March 2010 20:39, alex <alex_at_lurk.org> wrote:
>> There's been a spate of articles being nominated on deletion for not
>> being notable, and TOPLAP is no exception.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TOPLAP
>>
>> So if we want to keep our page in wikipedia we have to add references
>> to media articles (newspaper, TV etc rather than blogs and websites):
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N#General_notability_guideline
>>
>> If you think of anything please contribute!
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> alex
>>
>> --
>> http://yaxu.org/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://yaxu.org/
Received on Thu Mar 04 2010 - 16:28:27 GMT