I bet someone has a piece of software with inverse undo, which adds
complexity as punishment anytime you try to go back on yourself...
(adrian ward or another software art guru...)
On 30 Oct 2009, at 13:15, Laurens van der Wee wrote:
>
>>
>> Wow, an hour or two moving boxes around? Sounds inefficient.
>> Generally I think
>> it's a good idea to patch cleanly in the first place so you don't
>> have to do
>> that. Also, this max video is interesting:
>> <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fcqF9hDNoJk>
>> I wish Pd supported some of those UI features.
>
> I wish Max would support it too. I mean, for some reason Cycling74
> doesn't feel like building something like that in their software.
> The nasty thing about Lécaudé's toolbox (I use it always and like it
> a lot) is the fact that it isn't a part of the undolist. So if you
> make a mistake connecting a lot of wires at the same time in a way
> that it crosses a lot of existing wires, you can't undo and you'll
> have to remove them all by hand...
>
Received on Mon Nov 02 2009 - 20:13:48 GMT