[livecode] computation

From: alex <alex_at_lurk.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 09:42:48 +0100

Here's an abstract I submitted to a conference on "practice,
participation and method in live electronic music".

  If our understanding of music is grounded in the body, then what
  hope is there for those who write software to generate music? This
  problem is particularly true of live coders, who write dynamically
  interpreted source code to make music while an audience listens and
  watches \citep{Collins03a}. When we are engrossed in computation,
  the manipulation of discrete symbols, are we too far from bodily
  movements to make music? Some creators of tangible interfaces to
  computer music might think so, instead working tirelessly to hide
  their computation backstage, bringing the human body to the fore
  once again.

  But lets not forget, symbols are part of musical understanding too.
  Scottish pipers chant the Gaellic syllables of Canntaireachd to
  relate articulation of their instruments \citep{Chambers80}. Indian
  drummers represent movements of the hands over the tabla drums with
  a vocabulary of onomatopoeic bol syllables \citep{Patel03b}. Indeed
  symbols themselves are represented relative to movements of our
  vocal tract \citep{Ladefoged90}, and we understand our instruments
  in terms of those same movements \citep{Traube05}.

  A great hope for live coding then is in helping us understand the
  relationship between symbolic and perceptual/conceptual
  representations of music through experimental artistic practice. We
  can think of symbols as waymarkers in our perceptually grounded
  conceptual understanding of movement, and music as a dance between
  human computation and perceptual understanding. Live coders have
  the opportunity to lay this dance bare.

  In this paper some possibilities of reframing live coding as a
  symbolic interaction with spatial representations are outlined,
  including the notion of \emph{vocable synthesis}, using the
  typewritten word as a sequence of articulations of an instrument.

The paper was rejected because the focus was too computational. This
sounds like sour grapes (and probably is) but my point was that the
field wasn't computational enough, considering this music is usually
made using computers, music tradition is full of symbolic
representations, and human symbols and articulations are inextricably
entwined.

I think we need another conference on live coding. Who'd be up for hosting it?


alex

-- 
http://yaxu.org/
Received on Fri Oct 02 2009 - 08:43:18 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST