No reason you can't run C/C++ in an interpreter:
http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 12:08 +1100, James Baker wrote:
> I've never used it but...
>
>
> "ProcessPP is the realisation of a rather silly idea: A livecoding
> environment for C++. As C++ is not interpreted, but compiled, this
> indeed does sound like a really silly idea. But the twist is that
> while "true" livecoding cannot be done, it can be at least made as
> easy as possible to try out new code snippets."
>
> http://tapas.affenbande.org/wordpress/?page_id=91
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:58 AM, evan.raskob [lists]
> <lists_at_lowfrequency.org> wrote:
> > What I want to now is who livecodes in C++, and how???
> > Tell me you're not writing .h files during the performance... ;)
> >
> > cheers
> > evan
> >
> >
> > On Jan 11, 2009, at 4:48 PM, thor wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 11 Jan 2009, at 15:28, Kassen wrote:
> >>
> >>> That said; the SC-CK rivalry is of course a very real thing that should
> >>> be taken very seriously. After all; it's well known that SC users eat babies
> >>> ;¬).
> >>
> >> Such dualisms are boring. What about CSound? Is that not a live coding
> >> environment?
> >> How come only one participant mentioned CSound? Do we have a cultural gap
> >> here?
> >> Are people using CSound not subscribed to mailing lists due to low
> >> bandwidth in
> >> retirement homes?
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
Received on Mon Jan 12 2009 - 08:45:36 GMT