Hiho,
On Thursday 03 April 2008 10:47:07 alex wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:00 +0200, Marcel Wierckx wrote:
> > ah, but it's a matter of trust that the something that happened is a
> > result of some kind of effort on the part of the performer. So yes,
> > it's about the potential that you're being lied to and that there's
> > simply no way to tell for sure. Not that I think that laptop
> > performers do this intentionally, but simply the fact that the
> > potential for deceit is there I feel is problematic for laptop
> > performance
>
> I still disagree -- if I can't see a performance the question of whether
> 'it' could be authentic or not simply can't be asked, as I can't see
> what 'it' is, or what it is supposed to be.
Isn't performance all about deceit?
sincerely,
Marije
Received on Thu Apr 03 2008 - 15:14:31 BST