Re: [livecode] live coding and free software - feedback rqrd

From: Dave Griffiths <dave_at_pawfal.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:13:22 +0100 (BST)

>On 02/04/2008, Julian Rohrhuber
>>I'm mentioning this because in oil-paintings it's now clear that the
>>audience *is* interested in the process. Considerable resources are
>>spend trying to determine how the great masters painted and what
>>paint they used. Indeed, one wouldn't ask Picasso how much his brush
>>cost but evidently people are very interested in what paint Van Gogh
>>used and how he got it.
>
> Heiko Neumeister has done some such work:
> eg. http://home.claranet.de/locomotion/klee.html (Paul Klee remakes)

That's great!

In regard to oil painting, I find impasto significant, in that the strokes
and movement of the artist are captured and form an important part of the
'end result'.

>>I'm starting to think there's so much to say about FLOSS and
>>livecoding in relation to other forms of art that instead of
>>suggesting bits in addition to this article there's space for a few
>>more articles!

I agree. For me, free software and livecoding are very interlinked.

cheers,

dave
Received on Thu Apr 03 2008 - 14:13:47 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST