On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 13:21 +0000, Dave Griffiths wrote:
> nice, I find it more understandable than perl - would you say the language
> (or the interface to the language underneath) is closer to a musical score
> than a general purpose language?
Yes I suppose I would. It's not turing complete so I don't know if it's
fully toplap compliant though.
> extra points for the stack overflow too! :) is this what you're performing
> tomorrow?
I've tried to perform with it twice and not had much luck... I'd like
to persevere though if you + ade are up for it!
We're playing at fave in London, or at least I think we are (we're not
shown on the website):
http://www.fave.org.uk/mambo/index.php
If anyone else wants to come and play (I mentioned it to Nick but forgot
to follow up on it, sorry Nick) then I'm sure we can negotiate
something.
alex
Received on Fri Nov 24 2006 - 21:20:23 GMT