Yes, but I think Live-Coding is a theme in which
other areas are automatically brought in. How
healthy.
tt
On Jun 6, 2006, at 11:51 AM, DJ Fadereu wrote:
> but this question does seem to
> deal with something else altogether than
> livecoding...
> --
>
> I don't completely agree, quite on the contrary,
> since every software is an abstract machine
> according to my definition.
>
> But yeah, if you want a duel, lets take it outside :)
> I'll mail you.
>
> On 6/6/06, douglas edric stanley <destanley_at_mac.com> wrote: >I
> thought I'd comment in the livecode mailing list
> >since Stanley is a member.
>
> I don't know if this is really the place. I only
> briefly mentioned the term in that interview
> (along with livecoding btw), so it would be too
> long to discuss here, methinks. "Abstract
> Machine" is a complex term that has a historical
> use (Deleuze & Guattari) as well as a
> technological use (computer science), upon which
> I glob my own definition. Rather than discussing
> semantics and etymology here, I wonder if we
> shouldn't have this discussion somewhere else so
> as not to bother the livecoders. Of course I
> would be willing to take a stab at answering your
> question here, but this question does seem to
> deal with something else altogether than
> livecoding...
> --
> /*
>
> // Douglas Edric Stanley
> <douglas_at_abstractmachine.net>
>
> // Artiste
> http://www.abstractmachine.net
>
> // Professeur d'Arts numeriques, L'école supérieure d'art d'Aix-en-
> provence
> http://www.ecole-art-aix.fr/
>
> // Chercheur, Laboratoire Esthétique de l'interactivité, Université
> de Paris 8
> http://www.ciren.org
>
> */
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---------------fade/in--------------------
> DJ Fadereu (+91 98675 80501)
> Bombay
> An online archive of my work:
> http://rohitgupta.xwiki.com
> ----------------fade/out------------------
Received on Tue Jun 06 2006 - 09:54:32 BST