>The thing that GP and livecoding share in opposition to the traditional
act of
>writing software, is that they are more concerned with the program being
part
>of a dynamic process. Nothing is ever finished.
That is funny to see that this could also be said of the computer as being
a fundamental part of the artifact (or a performance) as opposed to merely
being used to create art. This is highly interesting when trying to
establish a relationship between art and technology, is not it ?
Alex (the one with the big A)
Received on Wed Apr 13 2005 - 14:40:00 BST