(with-delurk
On Friday, April 01, 2005, at 01:40PM, Dave Griffiths <dave_at_pawfal.org> wrote:
>Coming back to what I first blurted out, I have to admit that there is
>something about the pure GP approach with fitness functions and so on, that
>doesn't sit well for me.
Supervised evolution, the best-known examples probably being the art of Karl Sims or William Latham, might be the sweet spot for live genetics when combined with the editor for tweaking the code.
You could have the variations played in order and mark the best ones as they play to be the seed for the variations for the next sequence.
- Rob.
)
Received on Fri Apr 01 2005 - 13:53:30 BST