On Thu, 27 May 2004, Nick Collins wrote:
NC>
NC> > btw, how are we doing on time?
NC>
NC> weekend to go. We'll compile a finished thing on Monday I guess.
NC>
ok, i've made some edits and added 2 small screengrabs... but if 2's a
problem, we can trade for one (i can include it that resolution or higher,
whichever works better). i also added a bit in my section about my
thoughts on the user->author continuum... not sure if everyone will agree
with what i've said, but i've tried to clearly indicate that it's my
opinion only and not everybody's... but if anyone thinks it should be
changed/clarified please let me know!
NC>
NC> > shall we also note where are sections are derived from email discussion?
NC> i would prefer that people not think i would write in such a rambling,
NC> incoherent manner for a formal paper (even though that may also be true
NC> :-).
NC>
NC> I like the loose style and fuck the formality. I prefer the strong
NC> character shining through...
NC>
agreed, i've been known to write actual papers that way too... just wasn't
sure in this case if we should clarify why it changes degrees of formality
when it gets to the email stuff...
NC> No, of course, we can note that the large part of the field studies is from
NC> discussion on the TOPLAP mailing list.
NC>
sounds good to me!
Received on Fri May 28 2004 - 03:28:23 BST