On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 08:52:34AM +0000, David Barbour wrote:
> If you control a squadron of killer robots, you certainly have an audience.
> They just aren't intended to appreciate it.
>
> For performance, an audience forges a relationship to the real world, real
> risks for fumbling, real rewards for success. But the live coder's
> experience is similar when it's some other relationship keeping things real.
How much genuine mileage is there in a definitional discussion without a
specific practice that people can point at and say "that's live coding".
If you are a live coder, could you post what you think constitutes an
uncontroversial example of live coding in action? If it makes sense for
that example, I'd be interested in a video of live coding that would be
clearly recognisable as such in a matter-of-fact to the people involved
in the experience, and where those people are visible to the camera.
Cheers,
Saul
--
phone: +44(0)7941255210 / +44(0)2071007915
skype:saulalbert | _at_saul | http://saulalbert.net
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/1H7ZERn68vqKWU4QUTNWxE
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Mon Dec 28 2015 - 18:57:00 GMT