Dave,
On 25 December 2015 at 14:00, David Griffiths <dave_at_pawfal.org> wrote:
> While music may or may not be a good application of livecoding 'as a
> tool' - it even might be the case that computation *is* music, and by
> experiencing it's construction by a performer, we may be able to learn
> something about the algorithmic world we live in.
I could dig that if I dropped enough acid.
> In a similar way, livecoding also has potential to expose clearly a
> secret aspect of technology - the way it's pursued in a fumbling, zigzag
> approach with many restarts - rather than the smooth, planned series of
> 'innovations' that people who want us to invest in their companies would
> like us to believe.
I think the above is one of the reasons I might want to study live
coding. Thank you for stringing those words together.
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/5Myu8EfVRpB06Wais08ubT
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Sat Dec 26 2015 - 11:02:57 GMT