I like "code music" and had it written down somewhere as a good book title some day for a text about musicians and programming. But I also think it doesn't get across the performative dimension for live coding sufficiently for live coding alone, since it quickly makes me think of non-realtime algorithmic composition, or cryptographic sonification et al. Of course "live code music" doesn't help the present discussion...
"instant music programming"
"in the moment coding"
"immediate algoravethms"
best
N
On 16 Mar 2015, at 19:01, David Ogborn <ogbornd_at_mcmaster.ca> wrote:
> I'm surprised I've never run across "code music" given that the "liveness" of the code is not as straightforward (i.e. live coding is always resting on layers of dead coding). Of course, "code art" does get used here and there, and I like that a lot.
>
> Yours truly,
> David
>
> On 2015-03-16, at 2:57 PM, Julian Rohrhuber wrote:
>>
>>> On 14.03.2015, at 17:29, alex <alex_at_slab.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Uses in arts context became the minority a while
>>> ago and with the growth of this site it's impossible to follow the
>>> phrase any more.
>>>
>>> I think this is all great, but it's going to make it difficult to talk
>>> about live coding as we understand it..
>>
>> We can still return to the good old "just in time programming" - that is awkward enough that nobody is going to use it ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
>> http://lurk.org/r/topic/6K7UKNeKzCM2ek1n5B8qdN
>>
>> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
>
>
> --
>
> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
> http://lurk.org/r/topic/tdd2ZpbSKIuJhublglYEG
>
> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/2m4VK8S3n2lacIUN0RuOCt
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Mon Mar 16 2015 - 21:00:51 GMT