Re: [livecode] Short comments invited by editors of a forthcoming book on Algorithmic Music

From: Gavin Starks <gavin_at_dgen.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 01:37:07 +0200 (CEST)

This is great news – looking forward to seeing it develop.

Some question emerged to me immediately;

-- how the context of Algorithmic Music sits with Computer-Music, Sonic Art, etc?
I'd recommend adding Wishart to your list of opening references (in particular On Sonic Art).

-- it feels like there's some great re-working of ontologies to be done too?
For example, you say "especially by computer" in your definition – if I use mathematics in my compositions, does it become "algorithmic" at the point of codification, or earlier (what if it's only in my thinking)? Does it need to/should it be "live/realtime/dynamic" or can I pre-render? Do I have to be able to demonstrate the existence of an algorithm? What if the algorithm is derived from the music, instead of being its creator?

-- how much has the work on livecoding (explicitly where the code is visible) impacted the audience experience / causality-gap that can be a challenge in acousmatic music?

... so many questions! :)
-- 
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/4HzC8VFReOAG04bRqkhsUZ
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Sun Jul 13 2014 - 23:36:29 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST