On 16/04/2009, at 6:56 PM, alex <alex_at_lurk.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 17:56 +1000, Andrew Sorensen wrote:
>> Yep, the new additions are to allow support for netclock.
>
> Ace! Do you mind if I add you to the netclock mailing list ( at
> http://lists.lurk.org/mailman/listinfo/netclock/ )
Sure
>> In practice
>> NTP support means impromptu could act as either a netclock host or
>> client depending on how NTP was setup on the box.
>
> I'm probably being dumb here but I see ntp as running separately from
> apps like impromptu. Do you mean impromptu syncs to the system
> clock in
> a way it didn't before, or that you have built an ntp server into
> impromptu somehow?
Syncs to the system clock. I'm also looking at other clock options.
I'm imagining multiple options for clock sources - not just NTP. We
should probably take this onto the netclock list.
>
>
> seeya
>
> alex
>
>
Received on Thu Apr 16 2009 - 10:29:34 BST