Impromptu for me.
Cheers,
AS
On 14/12/2008, at 2:51 AM, Gabriel G wrote:
>
> Answer to question 1 for me is
>
> Ruby Lanauge
> Chuck
>
> And currently learning to combine the two languages together using
> Chuckr
>
> and the Answer for 2 is really the same has above i play and program
> both of them sometimes i will stream live midi to extrenal softsynth
> like reason 4
>
> Alphacore
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Kassen
> <signal.automatique_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 1 - Which software (or language) do you use for livecoding ? (if
> several, ranked by preference plz)
>
> ChucK.
>
>
> 2 - Which software (or language) did you ever try for livecoding ?
>
> ChucK; I like it. I play it for my own pleasure, played it in
> "chamber" settings as well as on more formal stages
>
> Fluxus; Loved playing with it while listening to CD's (that were
> also fed into it). Nice language, nice interface, I need to get back
> to this and come to grips with it all properly. Only played it for
> my own pleasure privately.
>
> Various modular systems; I feel these can be a equivalent to "code"
> given enough logic modules. "optimisation" becomes a very real
> question if you have only so many logic gates. I especially want to
> mention the joys of collaborate "programming" on larger hardware
> ones and the interesting data-collisions in such contexts on bus-
> based routing schemes like on the Arp 2500.
>
> SuperCollider; a great system for livecoding, I love what others do
> with it but I had to give it up before I got to a stage I'd call
> livecoding in any sense of the word as SC's way of thinking didn't
> seem to be mine. I should try again.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
>
Received on Sun Dec 14 2008 - 09:25:16 GMT