Re: [livecode] Informal survey : which soft for livecoding ? (Please read ! )

From: Gabriel G <gabrielg1976_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 08:51:54 -0800

Answer to question 1 for me is

Ruby Lanauge
Chuck

And currently learning to combine the two languages together using Chuckr

and the Answer for 2 is really the same has above i play and program both of
them sometimes i will stream live midi to extrenal softsynth like reason 4

Alphacore




On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Kassen <signal.automatique_at_gmail.com>wrote:

>
> 1 - Which software (or language) do you use for livecoding ? (if several,
>> ranked by preference plz)
>
>
> ChucK.
>
>
>>
>> 2 - Which software (or language) did you ever try for livecoding ?
>>
>
> ChucK; I like it. I play it for my own pleasure, played it in "chamber"
> settings as well as on more formal stages
>
> Fluxus; Loved playing with it while listening to CD's (that were also fed
> into it). Nice language, nice interface, I need to get back to this and come
> to grips with it all properly. Only played it for my own pleasure privately.
>
> Various modular systems; I feel these can be a equivalent to "code" given
> enough logic modules. "optimisation" becomes a very real question if you
> have only so many logic gates. I especially want to mention the joys of
> collaborate "programming" on larger hardware ones and the interesting
> data-collisions in such contexts on bus-based routing schemes like on the
> Arp 2500.
>
> SuperCollider; a great system for livecoding, I love what others do with it
> but I had to give it up before I got to a stage I'd call livecoding in any
> sense of the word as SC's way of thinking didn't seem to be mine. I should
> try again.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
>
Received on Sat Dec 13 2008 - 16:52:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST