>
> So I've already assumed that I need a million cpu's.
>>
>
> Yes, I noticed, but this assumption is incorrect, in fact this kind of
> thing is easier on a single CPU as there is less need to sync stuff.
>
> I'm not going to argue this any further as I could probably just have
> written the whole thing in the time that was now spend on this.
>
> No offence; you can try my method or you could send me a outline of what
> you need exactly (it sounds like Wolfram's CA's on a circular line?) and
> I'll see when I get round to writing it (probably tomorrow or so) but I'm
> not going to play "is / isn't" over this. I mean that in the most friendly
> possible way.
>
So do I, my friend, but now I think you're so far off the issue that we
should just close this discussion. I already have the answer I needed, so
lets just leave it here. There is no point arguing more.
cheers,
------- -.-
1/f ))) --.
------- ...
http://www.algomantra.com
Received on Wed Sep 17 2008 - 00:24:50 BST