AlgoMantra
So I've already assumed that I need a million cpu's.
>
Yes, I noticed, but this assumption is incorrect, in fact this kind of thing
is easier on a single CPU as there is less need to sync stuff.
I'm not going to argue this any further as I could probably just have
written the whole thing in the time that was now spend on this.
No offence; you can try my method or you could send me a outline of what you
need exactly (it sounds like Wolfram's CA's on a circular line?) and I'll
see when I get round to writing it (probably tomorrow or so) but I'm not
going to play "is / isn't" over this. I mean that in the most friendly
possible way.
Cheers,
Kas.
Received on Wed Sep 17 2008 - 00:19:27 BST