sure, why not?
but i think some of the surrealists may have beat us there ;)
in fact, i am not being completely facetious, someone has already
written software that "imitates" Pollock's painting methods (do a
search for Pollock on Youtube, it's neat). so someone can start the
cross-fading there...
i think we're officially OT now.
cheers
evan
On Mar 7, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Kassen wrote:
>
>
> On 07/03/2008, evan.raskob [lists] <lists_at_lowfrequency.org> wrote:
>
>
> That's a bit like taking Shakespeare and Jackson Pollock and trying
> to cross-fade between them.
>
>
> This sounds like a excellent plan to me. I would love to see
> somebody even *try* to crossfade between those two, in fact I would
> love to read a paper titled "why using non-euclidean parallel-
> processing failed to cross between Pollock and Shakespeare".
>
> (pun and serious implications intended)
>
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
Received on Fri Mar 07 2008 - 18:06:15 GMT