> Also, it seems unfair to grade software on their human-like behaviour
> without also grading people on their human-like behaviour. I'm not sure
> how well I'd do at that. Maybe we should be testing each other for
> computer like behaviour :)
affirmative
Tom
---------------------------------------------
http://www.nullpointer.co.uk
http://www.codespace.co.uk
http://www.r4nd.org
http://www.q-q-q.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "alex" <alex_at_slab.org>
To: <livecode_at_slab.org>
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [livecode] spot the AI
>
> It's always going to be easy to trick a computer to reveal their
> identity as such until the computer has full sensory apparatus.
>
> Turing proposals were complex, where the test subject should be asked
> whether their counterpart was male or female, rather than human or
> computer. You count how often the subject guesses right, and then see
> if they score the same if you replace the male with a computer program.
>
> See section one of the paper:
> http://loebner.net/Prizef/TuringArticle.html
>
>
>
> alex
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon Jun 26 2006 - 10:47:28 BST