bravo
yes, i think interactive programmins is a fair term that artists and
geeks
could live with.
t.t.
On Jun 6, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Julian Rohrhuber wrote:
>> yes, outside of live-coding itself, which does not really
>> exist, because think + type + compile + run is a not real time
>> sport, really. often i think, it might be better to term it
>> a new form interfacing.
>
> Interfacing is slightly problematic, as it is full of assumptions
> that live coding tries to weaken (talking about environments is a
> good way to avoid this I think). I tend to use the term interactive
> programming as the non-stage artistic or scientific paradigm.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_programming
>
> --
>
>
>
>
>
> .
Received on Tue Jun 06 2006 - 10:56:03 BST