I agree that would be the better option, I think i'll add some more
reading to my own todo list.
james
On 4/25/06, Steve McConville <
mcconville.steve_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Well seeing as Io comes with socket support out of the box a
> > rudimentary OSC implementation shouldn't be too taxing. Mind you, I'm
> > not comfortable enough with the language yet to do so.
>
> I was thinking more along the lines of writing a binding for an
> existing OSC Kit- Io is reputed to be very easy to embed C in and the
> language developers encourage this (for speed and size reasons),
> unlike the 'keep it all in the VM' world. This is something that's
> also on my list of things to do if I get comfortable with the code and
> make enough time.
>
> --
> steev();
> http://www.ruccas.org/index.php?Mal-0x
>
Received on Tue Apr 25 2006 - 13:42:44 BST