Re: [livecode] more new members

From: Till Bovermann <tboverma_at_techfak.uni-bielefeld.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 17:49:08 +0200

Yeah, definitely, but... I havn't seen a proper environment for doing
so...
something like the language frontend as seen at SuperCollider would
fit nice...
Also there is currently no OSC communication possible...

Till

On 24 Apr 2006, at 15:35, James Baker wrote:

> I'm totally with you on the Io front Steve, been keeping tabs on that
> lately since I accidently stumbled across it. Io + on-fly would be an
> excellent combination.
>
> James
>
> On 4/24/06, Steve McConville <mcconville.steve_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all- I mostly work with python and CSound, and entirely in Free
>> software. My interest in livecoding stems from the fact that all my
>> pieces are algorithmic and generated, and I'd like more performance
>> possibilities than 'pressing play' or using different random seeds. I
>> think it all comes down to being a computer geek and wanting to be a
>> rock & roll star too :)
>>
>> I was working on a livecoding environment, but have now abandoned the
>> design as absurdly clunky. Instead I'm hoping to finish some
>> libraries
>> from that project and hopefully knit something together once I've
>> properly figured out the CSound5 API and python bindings. I'm also
>> interested in Io and OSC. I think, even moreso than python, that
>> Io is
>> an ideal language for on-the-fly programming.
>>
>> --
>> steev();
>> http://www.ruccas.org/index.php?Mal-0x
>>
Received on Mon Apr 24 2006 - 15:49:24 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST