Re: [livecode] sonar etc

From: Barry Carter <barry.carter_at_intoit-ltd.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 13:22:58 +0100

Tom,

what the hell are these emails about!!! they dont look like spam emails so I
assume my email address has been added as a mistake/joke. Is this anything to
do with Alex and/or toplap.org? Im a developer myself (not perl) but cant make
the connection between perl and music(live recording!?#). If this is toplap
related, pass my email onto Alex (M?) and say thanks for including me out of
love (and my offer still stands).

Barry


Quoting Tom Betts <tom_at_nullpointer.co.uk>:

 i want to see a coding environment that is intuitive to a user AND to an
 audience.
 
 Tom
 ---------------------------------------------
 http://www.nullpointer.co.uk
 http://www.r4nd.org
 http://www.q-q-q.net
 ----- Original Message -----
 From: "Dave Griffiths" <dave_at_pawfal.org>
 To: <livecode_at_slab.org>
 Cc: <livecode_at_slab.org>
 Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 1:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [livecode] sonar etc
 
 
> Hi to all, this is my first post here. I witnessed the slub+nebogeo
> live-coding performance at sonar and, honestly, it was the most
> interesting thing I saw during the festival (I only attended the day
> events though).
 
 Many thanks Sam! I wish I had seen more of sonar, maybe next year...
 
> I understand your previous comments about code obfuscation, but I also
> agree with Dave's early comment about coding from scratch to let the
> audience grasp what it's all about. I don't necessarily mean you
> should write the synthesis engine on-stage, but I think that some
> scripts from scratch would help in this direction.
>
> Still, I don't think the point is that everyone should "understand"
> the code as programmers, but instead realize that you are indeed
> coding live. I wonder if part of the audience just though it was
> merely a conceptual thing to project the text screens...
 
 I agree that understanding every line of the code is not important (I
 can't understand a line of perl, but alex's performances are facinating to
 me).
 
 I think my problem with obfuscation is that it could lead to a kind of
 elitism, and mean that we play only for an initiate in-crowd. So I don't
 think things should be dumbed down, but I personally don't like things to
 be unnecessarily complicated in this way.
 
 cheers,
 
 dave
 
 
 
 
 
Received on Fri Jul 01 2005 - 12:25:17 BST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST