On 26 December 2015 at 16:19, David Barbour <dmbarbour_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I think a computer must be involved with processing the code. I'm not
> inclined to include a Simon Says game as live coding, for example. But it
> doesn't need to be today's common keyboard-video-mouse setup. And the
> computer could certainly communicate in ad-hoc ways with other people,
> robots, and devices.
It's funny, I came here expecting to be told that my definitions were
too restrictive - not to be telling other people that.
If you're using this definition what distinguishes just using a
programmable computer program (lets say Excel) from live coding?
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/6YN3PsRb6a6znz2nS93s5Y
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Sun Dec 27 2015 - 11:39:48 GMT