> Did someone mention "don't forget - music is an executable language" yet?
I think people have hinted. How does that help us talk about live coding?
I agree if you're talking about music notation.... in the same way as
a recipe is right?
Or are you an arts student and talking about something far more
nebulous and wobbly?
On 27 December 2015 at 10:09, Amy Alexander <amyjalexander_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Did someone mention "don't forget - music is an executable language" yet?
> If not, then...
> Don't forget, music is an executable language.
>
> Merry Break Down Your Boxes Day in B Flat...
>
> -Amy
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:01 AM, Tristan Strange <tristan.strange_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Zoe!
>>
>> > I hope you don't mind my eavesdropping until I know a little bit more.
>>
>> I'm not bothered at all. Google and GCHQ are listening!
>>
>> > I'm new to this group and coding in general.
>>
>> I'm relatively new round here too and really should have done an
>> introduction too.
>>
>> Live coders are much friendlier than what my OP might indicate. I'm
>> just being a christmassy git to try and conversation going.
>>
>> If any particular LC description resonates with you I'd love to hear
>> about it! Experience isn't a pre-requisite for knowing what your on
>> about.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tris
>>
>>
>> On 25 December 2015 at 16:13, Zoe C Berger <zoecberger_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm new to this group and coding in general.
>> >
>> > I'm an artist using live code as artistic medium. I'm still figuring a
>> lot of things out. I hope you don't mind my eavesdropping until I know a
>> little bit more. It's nice to hear others views on this
>> >
>> > Also, merry merry , ect ...
>> >
>> > Zoe
>> >
>> >> On Dec 25, 2015, at 9:46 AM, Tristan Strange <tristan.strange_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It warms my cockles to see people thinking about live code on
>> >> Christmas day... I've been told I'm not to think about it and am
>> >> sneaking this response in!
>> >>
>> >> Really nice to see some sentences that'll stand up to a prod or two!
>> >>
>> >> Even the cats definition isn't as bad as some on the list....
>> >>
>> >>> On 25 December 2015 at 14:00, David Griffiths <dave_at_pawfal.org> wrote:
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 24/12/15 21:39, alex wrote:
>> >>>> I'm going to have to bite..
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 24 December 2015 at 19:25, David Barbour <dmbarbour_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>> Live coding is using a powerful language as an HCI. This is opposed
>> to
>> >>>>> using application specific language (predefined forms or widgets, a
>> weak
>> >>>>> CLI language, etc.) that hinder flexible expression or abstraction.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I think it's worth separating live coding from its application in
>> >>>>> performance and music. With augmented reality, and internet of
>> things, or
>> >>>>> semantic webs, we could see a much wider applications.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Yeah we wouldn't want to see such a passing, limited interest topic
>> >>>> such as "music" seen in the same light as these three much more
>> >>>> important, far sighted and serious applications! It's not as though
>> >>>> music is woven into just about every human ritual or anything like
>> >>>> that.
>> >>>
>> >>> While music may or may not be a good application of livecoding 'as a
>> >>> tool' - it even might be the case that computation *is* music, and by
>> >>> experiencing it's construction by a performer, we may be able to learn
>> >>> something about the algorithmic world we live in.
>> >>>
>> >>> In a similar way, livecoding also has potential to expose clearly a
>> >>> secret aspect of technology - the way it's pursued in a fumbling,
>> zigzag
>> >>> approach with many restarts - rather than the smooth, planned series of
>> >>> 'innovations' that people who want us to invest in their companies
>> would
>> >>> like us to believe.
>> >>>
>> >>> Nice to be discussing this stuff here again :)
>> >>>
>> >>> cheers,
>> >>>
>> >>> dave
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
>> >>> http://lurk.org/r/topic/6vlPmcsKabjGhQce03aukR
>> >>>
>> >>> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following
>> email subject: unsubscribe
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
>> >> http://lurk.org/r/topic/2IjTSVbklf53Je6BB0Hnx5
>> >>
>> >> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following
>> email subject: unsubscribe
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Read the whole topic here: livecode:
>> > http://lurk.org/r/topic/6tm1dUqNxEv9q6xo2bFLVB
>> >
>> > To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following
>> email subject: unsubscribe
>>
>> --
>>
>> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
>> http://lurk.org/r/topic/448BrFeSV6q1IGqaVKZA8f
>>
>> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email
>> subject: unsubscribe
>>
>
> --
>
> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
> http://lurk.org/r/topic/3AayWWWpukPLC4LBqEASs5
>
> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/M6vSJJd4SXqRNmQtR3muQ
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Sun Dec 27 2015 - 11:13:28 GMT