>
> > >That might well be an interesting distinction and one that could
> > >perhaps benefit the attempt to define what live coding is.
> > >I'm not sure myself, but what do people think?
>
> > As I see things not even live performance is essential for our kind of
> > lovecoding. We might be playing to ourselves for our own enjoyment.
I use live coding mainly for composing; in that case, the live aspect is
not about a performance but for bringing
together improvisation and composition.The real-time feedback while editing
code is useful to prevent compositional systems from getting out of hand
and forgetting about perception (eg: serialist techniques).
Received on Thu Jan 10 2013 - 10:02:51 GMT