Re: [livecode] live coding

From: Dan S <danstowell+toplap_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 21:12:22 +0000

Adam -

I'm curious to know, so allow me to take your statement at face
value... what kinds of claims from the Software Studies world (not a
world I know, AFAIK) are invalidated by livecoding?

Dan


2011/2/15 Adam Smith <adam_at_adamsmith.as>:
> Changed your mind?
>
> I'm interested to know the spectrum you ranged over.
>
> I suppose to some it can come off as a totally absurd practice, or a
> stunt as best. At the best of times it reveals a whole new perspective
> on software engineering where processes only usually (but by no means
> necessarily) have a temporally constant representation in source code.
>
> Having done a little bit of reading in Software Studies, I was
> surprised by just how many claims are invalidated with a single simple
> example of livecoding.
>
> Maybe the world isn't ready for it yet. That's fine, we can keep it
> here for now.
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Click Nilson <clicksonnil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Good to see some familiar and some new live coders emerge in this thread.
>>
>> I've changed my mind about live coding many times, and maybe that's why it's fun.
>>
>> CN
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Wed Mar 02 2011 - 21:12:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST