Re: [livecode] can we adopt these two?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Julian Rohrhuber <
rohrhuber_at_uni-hamburg.de
>
Date
: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:59:14 +0100
>2009/12/2 Click Nilson <<mailto:clicksonnil_at_gmail.com>clicksonnil_at_gmail.com>
>
><
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9gp9oyn0NE&NR=1
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9gp9oyn0NE&NR=1
>
>
>I find it striking that you can evidently be so very "toplap" while
>not involving "public thought".
Just a guess: they can be so toplap because they *are* a public thought.
-- .
Received on
Wed Dec 02 2009 - 18:59:39 GMT
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Kassen: "Re: [livecode] can we adopt these two?"
Previous message
:
Kassen: "Re: [livecode] can we adopt these two?"
In reply to
:
Kassen: "Re: [livecode] can we adopt these two?"
Next in thread
:
nicola buso: "Re: [livecode] can we adopt these two?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.4.0
: Sun Aug 20 2023 - 16:02:23 BST