Don't let me put you off, could be very cool.
But I had a quick look at the actual application forms required for
this last month, as possibly suggesting a SuperCollider bid, and came
to the conclusion that it was too much paperwork and too many
requirements on supervision and location. Maybe I've misread it, but
seems to require quite specific proposals with very careful
supervision arrangements (there is also the spectre of getting
university hosting support for this before making any official bid,
which can be less than simple admin in itself).
On the other hand, if I'm entirely wrong about how straight forward
it is, happy to be part of a bid, though no time for extensive admin
work on it before the 13th.
best,
N
On 4 Mar 2009, at 10:53, alex wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 11:36 +0100, gabor papp wrote:
>>> development of livecoding free software like supercollider, chuck
>>> and
>>> fluxus by paying students to work on them over the summer. Are
>>> any of
>>> those applying independently?
>> we were just talking about this with dave and evan and we would
>> like to
>> apply with fluxus definitely.
>
> That's good to hear... If other projects are interested in
> applying is
> it worthwhile pooling resources and applying as the toplap mothership?
> It'd be good to add netclock (inter-app network time sync for live
> (coding) performance) as a possible application idea, which would run
> across supercollider, chuck, fluxus and pd.
>
> cheers
>
> alex
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 04 2009 - 16:09:54 GMT