On 06 Jun 2006, at 18:27, Julian Rohrhuber wrote:
>> I've added a little figure to the page, what do you guys think
>> about it?
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_programming
>
> great to have such an illustration !
>
> I have a suggestion:
>
> conventional programming
>
> problem -> problem formulation -(alg./data[1])-> implementation ->
> solution (feeds back to [1])
>
> interactive programming
>
> problem[1] -> problem formulation(feeds back to [1]) -(alg./data
> [1])-> implementation -> solution (feeds back to [1])
>
>
> I think it is the right method when the problem is not clear in
> advance or depends critcally on the way it is expressed (typical
> situations would be good to collect). If the problem can be
> formally expressed clearly, then I'd rather try to go with Djikstra
> who held that a good language should basically be able to implement
> the abstract formula directly.
>
>>
>> If you don't like it - just [rem | impr] ove it...
> I do like it - but do you have the source file?
> --
I do... ;-) but atm I do not have the time to go deeper into your
suggestions and add them to the graphic...
regards
Till
Received on Wed Jun 07 2006 - 09:02:45 BST