>I've added a little figure to the page, what do you guys think about it?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactive_programming
great to have such an illustration !
I have a suggestion:
conventional programming
problem -> problem formulation -(alg./data[1])-> implementation ->
solution (feeds back to [1])
interactive programming
problem[1] -> problem formulation(feeds back to [1])
-(alg./data[1])-> implementation -> solution (feeds back to [1])
I think it is the right method when the problem is not clear in
advance or depends critcally on the way it is expressed (typical
situations would be good to collect). If the problem can be formally
expressed clearly, then I'd rather try to go with Djikstra who held
that a good language should basically be able to implement the
abstract formula directly.
>
>If you don't like it - just [rem | impr] ove it...
I do like it - but do you have the source file?
--
.
Received on Tue Jun 06 2006 - 16:28:32 BST