Live coding is using a powerful language as an HCI. This is opposed to
using application specific language (predefined forms or widgets, a weak
CLI language, etc.) that hinder flexible expression or abstraction.
I think it's worth separating live coding from its application in
performance and music. With augmented reality, and internet of things, or
semantic webs, we could see a much wider applications.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015, 7:11 AM Tristan Strange <tristan.strange_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
> The live coding world appears to be filling with hot air:
> https://github.com/iclc/iclc.github.io/blob/master/definitions.md
>
> Lets face it the above list is at least 50% nonsense even once we've
> pulled the obvious and hilarious jokes out.
>
> I'm going to have a pop at sorting through these over Christmas
> because I enjoy picking holes in woolly arguments. Probably start by
> sorting things in to a list of "what live coding can be used as
> vehicle for" and "what live coding might be"... then sorting the
> remainder by validity.
>
> Has anyone else already started?
>
> And does anyone have a definition not on the list?
>
> Pointers to the best papers addressing the subject would be much
> appreciated.
>
> Merry Christmas and bah hum bug to those of you that would prefer it.
>
> Tris
> xxxxx
>
> --
>
> Read the whole topic here: livecode:
> http://lurk.org/r/topic/7ezYQR1z29ZBsahzr2Si27
>
> To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email
> subject: unsubscribe
>
--
Read the whole topic here: livecode:
http://lurk.org/r/topic/4q3kjqjLirV5QFTQ5uPsa3
To leave livecode, email livecode_at_group.lurk.org with the following email subject: unsubscribe
Received on Thu Dec 24 2015 - 19:25:48 GMT